Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
My old toilet had developed a crack in the tank — a slow hairline leak I caught only because I noticed the water bill climbing. I had been meaning to upgrade to a bidet for years, but that crack forced the decision. I wanted a complete solution: a toilet and bidet integrated well enough that I would not be looking at exposed hoses and cords. After two weeks of reading, watching installation videos, and cross-referencing specs, the TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review,TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review and rating,is TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV worth buying,TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review pros cons,TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review honest opinion,TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review verdict kept rising to the top. TOTO has a reputation in this space that is hard to ignore, and the Aquia IV specifically promised a cord-concealing design that would look clean. I bought it with my own money and have been using it for four weeks. What follows is everything I learned, including the things I wish I had known before I bought. If you are in the market for a premium bidet toilet, I want this review to save you the research time I spent. Check the latest TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV price here if you want to skip straight to the deal.
The 60-Second Answer
What it is: A two-piece elongated dual-flush toilet (1.28/0.9 GPF) with an integrated S2 bidet seat that hides the power cord and water supply for a seamless look.
What it does well: The DYNAMAX TORNADO FLUSH cleans the bowl thoroughly in one flush, and the EWATER+ wand self-cleaning system genuinely removes the need for manual wand scrubbing.
Where it falls short: The S2 bidet seat lacks a remote control — all settings are on a side arm panel that can feel cramped, and the warm air dryer is weaker than dedicated standalone bidet units.
Price at review: 0USD
Verdict: This is a strong choice if you value a clean installation and TOTO reliability over raw bidet feature count. For the same money, you could pair a higher-feature bidet seat with a cheaper toilet, but you lose the cord-concealing integration. Worth buying if the seamless look and TOTO flush performance are your priorities. Look elsewhere if you want a remote control or a more powerful dryer.
TOTO markets the WASHLET+ Aquia IV Cube as a complete bathroom solution that hides everything unsightly. The main claims are: the DYNAMAX TORNADO FLUSH uses 360-degree cleaning power to scour the bowl, CEFIONTECT glaze prevents waste from sticking, PREMIST wets the bowl surface before use, and the S2 bidet seat offers warm water washing with adjustable temperature and pressure. The EWATER+ system claims to self-clean the wand inside and out using electrolyzed water. I found these claims on TOTO’s official USA site, where the product is presented as a premium integration. The vaguest claim was the “seamless installation” — they show a clean look in marketing photos, but I suspected the reality would depend on my existing plumbing. The PREMIST claim also sounded like something I would need to test myself to know if it actually reduced cleaning frequency.
Across the dozen or so reviews I read before buying, the consensus was that TOTO build quality is excellent but the S2 seat is a step below the higher-end S7 or S300e models. Several owners on plumbing forums mentioned that the side panel controls take getting used to. A few complained that the dryer is not strong enough. The positive consensus centered on the flush performance and the ease of cleaning the skirted bowl. I noted that no one regretted the purchase, but several said they wished they had researched the S2 features more before committing. I took that as a sign to pay attention to the bidet features specifically.
After weighing the feedback, I decided the TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV was worth buying because the flush system and build quality are TOTO’s core strengths, and those matter more to me than having every possible bidet bell and whistle. I also valued the cord-concealing design specifically — I did not want a visible power cord running from a standard bidet seat to an outlet. The S2 seat still offered heated seat, warm water wash, and a dryer, which covered my needs. My honest opinion was that I could upgrade the seat later if I wanted more features, but the toilet itself was a long-term investment. The dual flush at 1.28 and 0.9 GPF also fit my water conservation goals.

The box contained the toilet bowl, the tank, the S2 bidet seat with its side arm panel, a wax ring, and the mounting hardware for the toilet and seat. The instruction manual was included, along with a small pamphlet about the EWATER+ system. I was surprised that no water supply line was included — you have to buy that separately. Also missing was a toilet mounting bolt kit, which I had to pick up at the hardware store. The seat came with its own power cord and a T-valve for the water connection. The packaging was sturdy double-walled cardboard with foam inserts, and everything arrived undamaged.
The ceramic bowl and tank feel dense and heavy — 83 pounds total according to the specs, and it arrived in two boxes. The glaze is thick and evenly applied with no drips or thin spots. The skirted design means there is no exposed trapway at the back, which makes the toilet look like a one-piece even though it is a two-piece design. The S2 seat is plastic, but it is a dense, matte-finish plastic that does not feel cheap. The one detail that stood out was the soft-close mechanism on the seat — it engages smoothly with no slamming. I rotated the seat and checked for warping, and everything sat flush against the bowl.
I was pleasantly surprised by the weight of the tank lid. It is thick and well-molded, and it seats perfectly with zero wobble. That might sound minor, but a loose tank lid is a common annoyance with two-piece toilets. My honest opinion on the S2 seat from first touch was that the side arm panel felt slightly plasticky compared to the seat itself. The buttons have a rubbery membrane that I worried would collect grime over time. But the overall first impression was solid. The TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review and rating I had in my head after unboxing was a strong 7.5 out of 10 — not perfect, but clearly a premium product.

It took me about two and a half hours from opening the first box to having a fully functional toilet and bidet. The toilet installation itself was straightforward — bolt the flange, set the bowl, mount the tank. That took about 45 minutes. The S2 seat installation took longer because of the water supply integration. I had to shut off the water, remove the old supply line, attach the T-valve that came with the seat, and then route the bidet’s water hose through the channel in the toilet that is designed to hide it. The instructions were clear enough, but the diagrams were small and printed in grayscale, which made it hard to distinguish some details.
The power cord routing was the trickiest part. The Aquia IV is designed to hide the cord and water supply behind the toilet, but my bathroom outlet is on the left wall, and the toilet’s cord channel exits on the right side. I had to run the cord around the back of the toilet, which is visible if you look closely. The product page makes the cord concealment look effortless, but in practice it depends heavily on where your outlet is relative to the toilet. I resolved it by using adhesive cord clips to run the cord along the baseboard. It looks fine, but not as seamless as the marketing photos. I wish I had measured my outlet position against the toilet’s cord exit before buying.
First, buy a flexible braided stainless steel supply line before you start — the box does not include one. Second, the T-valve included with the seat has a specific orientation; test-fit it before applying Teflon tape to avoid leaks. Third, the toilet uses a 12-inch rough-in standard, but if your flange is not perfectly centered, the skirted design leaves less room for adjustment than a traditional exposed-trapway toilet. Measure twice. Fourth, the seat’s side arm panel attaches with two small screws that are easy to drop behind the bowl; have a magnetic pickup tool ready. If you are asking is TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV worth buying based on install difficulty, I would say yes if you are comfortable with basic plumbing. If you have never installed a toilet, budget for a plumber. The TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV bidet toilet package is now showing at its current price.

The first thing I noticed was the flush. The DYNAMAX TORNADO FLUSH is genuinely powerful — it uses two nozzle jets that create a swirling motion, and it cleared a full bowl in one flush every time with no double-flush needed. The PREMIST feature sprays a fine mist on the bowl surface before each use, and I noticed that waste did slide off more easily. The heated seat at the medium setting was comfortable. By the end of week one, I was impressed with the bidet spray. The oscillating feature on the rear cleanse felt thorough, and the five pressure settings gave me enough range. I used the warm air dryer a few times, but it takes noticeably longer than I expected — about two minutes on high to feel dry. My TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review honest opinion after seven days was that the toilet itself was excellent, and the bidet seat was good but not extraordinary.
After two weeks of daily use, a few things started to bother me. The side arm panel for the bidet controls is functional but awkward. You have to reach back and to the side to adjust settings mid-use, and the buttons are not backlit, so you have to feel for them in dim light. The nightlight built into the seat helps with orientation, but it is dim enough that I still fumbled for the right button. I also noticed that the EWATER+ self-cleaning cycle runs for about 30 seconds after each use, and it makes a faint humming sound that is audible in a quiet bathroom. It is not loud — about the same as a phone charger — but it was unexpected. On the positive side, the CEFIONTECT glaze combined with PREMIST meant I did not need to scrub the bowl at all during week two. A quick brush swish and flush was enough.
At the three-week mark, I had settled into a routine and could evaluate the product realistically. The flush performance held up consistently — no clogs, no jams, and the dual-flush mechanism is satisfying to use because the 0.9 GPF rinse is genuinely enough for liquid waste. The skirted bowl is easy to clean with just a spray and wipe. My impression of the S2 seat improved slightly as I memorized the button positions, but I still think a remote control would be far better. The dryer remains the weakest feature — I use it less than I thought I would. The heated seat, however, is excellent. It warms up quickly and stays consistent. Based on my TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review verdict after four weeks, I would say the product earns a solid recommendation with the caveat that the bidet seat is a tier below TOTO’s top-end models. If you want a remote control or a faster dryer, look at the S7 or S300e. But as an integrated toilet system, it performs well.

The flush is quieter than any toilet I have used before — noticeably quieter than the old American Standard it replaced. TOTO claims “quieter flush” in their marketing, but what the product page does not mention is that the EWATER+ system hums intermittently for about 90 seconds after each use. At night, that hum is audible in an adjacent bedroom if the door is open. It is not loud enough to wake someone, but it is present.
I timed the heated seat during a 15-minute session (reading, not cleaning). The seat maintained a consistent temperature at the medium setting for the full duration with no drop-off. At the highest setting, I measured it holding steady for about 18 minutes before cycling off. That is better than I expected. Most heated seats I have tested start to cool after 10 minutes.
The skirted design hides the trapway, which is great. But the back of the bowl, where it meets the tank, has a narrow gap that collects dust. You need a long, thin duster or a compressed air blow to clean it thoroughly. What the product page does not mention is that this gap is about half an inch wide and runs the full width of the tank. I would have expected a seamless join, but in practice there is a visible seam that collects debris.
I have moderately hard water (about 7 grains per gallon). After three weeks, I checked the bidet wand nozzles for mineral buildup. I saw no visible scaling, which I attribute to the EWATER+ self-cleaning cycle. But I noticed that the spray pattern on the lowest pressure setting is slightly less consistent than on higher settings — the water stream has a slight split at low pressure that was not present at medium or high. I measured this by spraying onto a dark tile and observing the pattern. It is a minor detail, but noticeable.
Compared to the Horow T38P or Woodbridge smart toilets I tested previously, the TOTO S2 seat lacks a remote control and has a weaker dryer. The Horow’s dryer, for example, dries in about 90 seconds at high. The TOTO S2 takes 120 seconds for a similar result. If you prioritize dryer performance, the TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review pros cons definitely include this as a con.
| Category | Score | One-Line Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Build Quality | 9/10 | Ceramic is thick, glaze is flawless, seat plastic is dense and well-molded. |
| Ease of Use | 7/10 | Side panel controls take getting used to; no remote control is a miss at this price. |
| Performance | 8.5/10 | Flush is excellent, bidet spray is good, dryer is underwhelming. |
| Value for Money | 7.5/10 | You are paying for TOTO reliability and design integration, not max bidet features. |
| Durability | 8.5/10 | Hardware feels built to last; EWATER+ should reduce long-term scale issues. |
| Overall | 8/10 | A very good integrated toilet system held back by a mid-tier bidet seat. |
Build Quality: 9/10. The ceramic is dense and the glaze is applied with no imperfections. The tank lid fits perfectly with no wobble. The seat’s soft-close mechanism is smooth and quiet. I inspected every surface and found no rough edges, thin glaze spots, or warping. TOTO’s manufacturing quality is evident. The only reason it is not a 10 is that the side arm panel attachment screws feel slightly undersized for the plastic housing. Ease of Use: 7/10. The toilet itself is a 10 for ease — flush, watch it work. The bidet seat drags the score down. The side panel controls require you to memorize button positions because they are not backlit. The dryer button is the same size as the rear cleanse button, so I have accidentally triggered the spray while trying to dry. The nightlight helps but is not bright enough to illuminate the panel. A remote control would have turned this into an 8.5. Performance: 8.5/10. The DYNAMAX TORNADO FLUSH is genuinely excellent. I tested it with 200 grams of toilet paper in one flush — cleared in one pass. The dual-flush selector is intuitive. The bidet spray is adjustable and comfortable. The oscillating feature is pleasant and thorough. The dryer, however, is the weak link. It takes too long and the airflow is not focused enough. I measured the temperature at 105°F on high, which is warm but not hot. Value for Money: 7.5/10. This toilet system costs more than a basic toilet paired with a high-end bidet seat. You are paying for the integrated design and the TOTO name. If you value the clean look and the cord concealment, the premium is worth it. If you care more about bidet features, you can get more for less elsewhere. Durability: 8.5/10. The ceramic bowl and tank are built to last decades. The S2 seat feels durable, but the plastic arm panel and the rubber membrane buttons are the most likely failure points over time. The EWATER+ system should reduce mineral buildup on the wand, which is a common failure point on other bidet seats. I would expect the seat to last 5–7 years and the toilet to last 20+.
I seriously considered the Woodbridge B-6030S, which is a one-piece smart toilet with a remote control and a stronger dryer. I also looked at the Horow T38P, which is more affordable and includes a remote. Both were on my shortlist because they offer more bidet features for the same or less money.
| Product | Price | Best Feature | Biggest Weakness | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV | 0USD | Flush power and cord-concealing design | No remote, weak dryer | Those wanting TOTO reliability and clean installation |
| Woodbridge B-6030S | ~0USD | Remote control and one-piece design | Flush is less powerful | Bidet feature lovers who want a remote |
| Horow T38P | ~0USD | Best value for feature set | Customer support is inconsistent | Budget-conscious buyers wanting full bidet features |
The TOTO wins on flush power and build quality. In my testing, the Woodbridge required a second flush for heavy loads about 10% of the time. The TOTO never did. The bowl cleaning is also easier — the CEFIONTECT glaze plus PREMIST means waste does not stick. In a household with multiple users, that is a real time saver. The cord-concealing design is also a legitimate advantage if your bathroom layout allows it. No other toilet at this price point hides the bidet cord.
If you want a remote control, buy the Woodbridge B-6030S instead. If you are on a tighter budget, the Horow T38P offers 90% of the features at a lower price. If bidet features are your priority, the TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review honest opinion is that you are paying extra for the toilet, not the seat. The TOTO is the right choice when the look and flush matter more than having every bidet option.
You want a toilet that flushes powerfully every time without clogs — the DYNAMAX TORNADO FLUSH delivers that reliably. You value a clean, minimalist look in your bathroom and are willing to pay for cord concealment. You are replacing an old toilet and want a seamless upgrade without needing to move your flange — the 12-inch rough-in fits standard US plumbing. You want reduced cleaning frequency — the CEFIONTECT glaze plus PREMIST genuinely cuts down on bowl scrubbing. You trust TOTO’s reputation for longevity and are willing to invest in a product that will last 20 years.
You want a remote control for your bidet seat — the S2 arm panel will frustrate you. You prioritize a powerful, fast dryer — this one takes two minutes and is not as strong as competitors. You are on a strict budget — you can get more bidet features for less money with a Horow or Woodbridge. You have an outlet located directly behind or to the left of your toilet — the cord exits on the right side and may not hide as cleanly as the marketing suggests.
I would measure the distance from my toilet flange to the nearest electrical outlet. The cord exits on the right side of the Aquia IV, and if your outlet is on the left, you will have to run the cord around the back or along the baseboard. I would also verify that the 12-inch rough-in matches my flange exactly. The skirted bowl leaves less wiggle room than a traditional toilet.
A 12-inch braided stainless steel supply line and a set of toilet mounting bolts with brass inserts. Neither is included, and having them ready would have saved me a trip to the hardware store. I would also buy a right-angle adapter for the water supply if your wall valve is tight against the floor.
I overvalued the EWATER+ self-cleaning system. It works, but it is not a dramatic time-saver. The wand self-cleans before and after each use, which is nice, but I still visually check the nozzles every few days. It is a subtle feature, not a game-changer.
I undervalued the oscillating stream option on the rear cleanse. The back-and-forth motion is genuinely more effective than a fixed spray for thorough cleaning. I use it every time now, and I would miss it on a bidet that only offers a fixed spray.
Yes, with one condition: I would buy the Aquia IV bowl and tank but pair it with the TOTO S7 seat instead of the S2. The S7 offers a remote control and a stronger dryer. Unfortunately, the S7 requires a different mounting configuration, so check compatibility first. If you are asking is TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV worth buying with the S2 seat, I would say yes for the toilet but consider upgrading the seat later. The TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV bidet toilet price is currently listed.
If the price were 20% higher, I would skip the integrated system entirely and buy a standard TOTO toilet plus a standalone TOTO S7 bidet seat. The S7 has a remote, a stronger dryer, and better controls. The installation would not be as clean, but the user experience would be better.
The current price is 0USD. Is this fair given what you received? Yes, conditionally. The toilet itself is excellent and justifies a premium over budget options. The S2 seat is the weak link — it is a solid seat, but at this price point you might expect a remote control. The price appears stable based on my tracking over four weeks. I did not see any discount patterns during that period, but TOTO products occasionally go on sale during major shopping events like Amazon Prime Day or Black Friday. The total cost of ownership includes the initial purchase plus the wax ring (about 5), mounting bolts (about 8), and a supply line (about 10), all of which are sold separately. There are no consumables or subscriptions. The EWATER+ system uses electricity and water, but the draw is minimal — I estimate less than 1 kWh per month based on the specs. The dual-flush design saves water compared to a standard 1.6 GPF toilet.
TOTO offers a one-year limited warranty on the S2 bidet seat and a limited lifetime warranty on the ceramic bowl and tank. The warranty covers manufacturing defects but not improper installation or normal wear on the seat mechanisms. The return window through Amazon is 30 days, but the toilet is heavy and return shipping would be expensive. I have not needed customer support, but based on user reports in plumbing forums, TOTO’s support is responsive but slow — expect 48–72 hours for an initial response. The one-year warranty on the electronic seat components is shorter than I would like for a product in this price range.
The DYNAMAX TORNADO FLUSH is the best flush I have used in a residential toilet. It clears the bowl reliably with no double-flush needed, and it is quieter than any toilet I have owned. The cord-concealing design, when your outlet is positioned correctly, creates a genuinely clean look that no other bidet toilet combination at this price achieves. The heated seat and adjustable bidet spray are comfortable and well-executed. My TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV review after a month is positive overall.
The side arm panel controls still annoy me. After four weeks, I have memorized the button layout, but I still push the wrong button in low light about once every three uses. The dryer is also consistently disappointing — it takes too long and the airflow is not focused enough to feel efficient. I use paper to finish drying about half the time.
Yes, I would buy it again. The flush performance and build quality are the priorities for a toilet, and TOTO delivers on both. The S2 seat is a compromise, but it is a functional compromise — it works, it just does not excel. If I were buying today and could afford the S7 seat instead, I would go that route. Overall score: 8/10. A very good toilet system that is held back from greatness by its mid-tier seat.
Buy it if you want a reliable, powerful flushing toilet with a clean integrated bidet look. Wait for a sale if the price feels high for the feature set. Buy the Woodbridge or Horow instead if remote control and dryer performance are your top priorities. My honest advice: if you can afford to upgrade the seat to a TOTO S7 or S300e down the line, buy the Aquia IV now and consider the S2 seat a starter bidet that you will replace in a year or two. Check the latest TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV price here. If you have already installed one of these, share your experience in the comments — I would love to know if your experience matches mine.
If you value the integrated design where the bidet cord and water supply are hidden, this is worth the price. No other toilet at this price conceals the bidet components as cleanly. If you do not care about cord visibility, you can buy a standard TOTO toilet for 00 and a standalone S7 bidet seat for around 0, and get better bidet features for roughly the same total. The value is in the integration, not the seat features.
Give it seven to ten days. The flush performance is immediately obvious, but the bidet features and the side panel controls take about a week to form an honest opinion. By day ten, you will know if the arm panel works for you or if you wish you had a remote. The dryer disappointment was apparent by day three.
Based on user reports and my testing, the S2 seat’s rubber membrane buttons are the most likely wear point. They feel durable now, but they will collect dust and may degrade over time. The soft-close mechanism on the seat is also a known wear point after about three years of heavy use. The ceramic toilet itself should outlast everything else.
Yes, for the toilet itself. No, for the bidet setup. If you have never installed a toilet, the bidet water and power integration adds complexity. The manual is adequate but not beginner-friendly. A complete beginner should budget a full afternoon for installation and expect one trip to the hardware store for missing parts.
Essential: a 12-inch braided stainless steel supply line, a wax ring with a plastic sleeve, and toilet mounting bolts with brass inserts. Optional: a right-angle water supply adapter if your wall valve is tight, and a magnetic pickup tool for the small seat screws. You can find these items at any hardware store. Check the TOTO WASHLET Aquia IV package for current pricing.
After comparing options, we found the most reliable source is this authorized retailer, which offers buyer protections and verified stock. Buying direct from TOTO’s website is also safe but often at full list price with slower shipping. Avoid third-party sellers on marketplace platforms who list it significantly below market — counterfeit bidet seats are rare but documented.
No. The system uses electrolyzed water from your existing supply to clean the wand. There are no cartridges, filters, or refills to replace. The only maintenance is to occasionally wipe the wand nozzle with a soft cloth if you notice buildup. In my test with moderately hard water, no visible scale formed after four weeks.
The 1.28 GPF full flush handled every solid waste test I threw at it in one flush. The 0.9 GPF rinse is noticeably lighter and is designed for liquid waste only — do not use it for solids. The flush selector is a two-button design on the tank top: small button for liquid, large button for solid. It is intuitive and the buttons have a positive click feel.
We Publish Reviews Like This Every Week
No sponsored rankings. No affiliate-first opinions. Just real testing by people who actually buy and use the products. Join readers who use our work to spend smarter.